hear-here a dog-poet's gutsgurgle=> How will I ever find a Luv whose common interests are-- SO CLOSE TO MINE... HOW I SAY CAN I 'SHAKE' YOU??? HOW?

 Nancy, FriendFeltFancily! KNOW that offline, in scribbled writs, a rather doggerel verse such as the 'convicted' make in jailcells-rejected, know I say that off/on of frequence I have 'sung ' to you in tones that you were not intended to 'hear,' as my wounded inner-voice the instant stinging from this year March 13 (lesserly from April 16) about OneStunned who quivers at the thought of you, utterly by all scenery never to be now addressed -- a discomfort-- a 'peace-disturbance,' an annoyance... O Nancy I think we both know that I would feel utterly fulfilled to brim, needing no more than that we chat as 'pals' again.

NOW the usual maniac in me, the motormouth, will convey, time to time, a note-from-the-notes of one ghost of Thine... I fear I fear over-other-wise communicating to you, albeit IFF you look these 'secret' blogged sentences to you-- of which I have only faint maybe hints time to time-- then MAYBE THERE WILL BE A SOMEDAY SOMEWAY WE CAN CHAT, IN MODE OF NO MATTER AT ALL IF (I HOPE) NOW YOU HAVE A TRUE LOVE WHO WOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN ME ;-)

Here is a jpg of the gut-verse I penned for you this morrow=>


How will I ever find a Luv whose common interests are-- SO CLOSE TO MINE... HOW I SAY CAN I 'SHAKE' YOU??? HOW?

Comments

  1. 2 Steps Forward, 1 BackwardJuly 19, 2024 at 5:05 PM

    I know, Nancy, I know how clumsy I am in the discipline (still, abidingly) of not bothering you, of not messaging you: the ASSUMPTION in this and my other Weblogs with you in mind is that the URL and indescript personal identification terms allow me to give full-throttle to a loveU which in no wise promises 'here today, gone tomorrow.' Now my suffering pushes a half-year duration (longer!)... we both know that a 'new love' will likely put-rest to a prior love-- MAY BE maybe not for-me-for-U... I do indicate at this juncture that finding Another with the same 'common-interests' we to-each-other-seemingly-present FOR ME? NOT LIKELY TO GET TO 'SUCH A FIND.' I ascertain wittingly that YOU ARE ONE JUST ONE OF THE MYRIAD FEMALES FOR WHOM M'EROS GOES TO 'THE ROCKS' OF MY BEING, TO THE BEDROCK FOR ME... IT IS SO HARD NOT TO BOTHER YOU, IT IS SO HARD, I SHALL CONTINUE TO DO MY BEST, THOUGH TO LET-YOU-LOVE-FREE-A-NOT-ME ;-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

νηζ! Fluffy-Flower! Wildflower! I never DID want you to be faithful to me: that is all I have ever told you for an 'expectation' WHEN WILL YOU TELL ME ABOUT LUVs?

Image
? Nancy Fancied by Men! I in Ecstasy and OneUnsolicited Txt IMAGINED Thy Luvs! NHz, perchance soon 2B a Mrs. or Ms to a colorful man, not me please: When you went to Belize March 2-10 I was naught but hopeful that you would multiply, in the works of the late Jimmy Hendrix "be Experienced" [dig-- and likely you got experienced, just please not for the first time ;-)] I have always loved it when my loves "fooled around"-- and maybe you did fool around-- but like my Ex and the Canadian girlfriend of 1968-1971 [Ellen [n`ee] Cail of Winnipeg, Nurse like Thee ;-)]as fooleraround did not tell me about what FUN it must have felt to look down copulating and see BlacknessInOutYou;  I of course have fondly wanted to be TOLD about the fooling so that I can REALLY FEEL You's doing the right thing and forgetting at least for  the time that I happy bliss  ever existed-- your message to this point in funning @Belize was specifically NO MESSAGES!!! OK! THEN TO BE GHOSTED! Goodby...
Read more

I WILL ALWAYS LOVE YOU

Image
   NANCY! NANCY! I AM TRYING UTMOST FOR YOU TO FEEL AT PEACE, FREE FROM ME, STILL JOYOUS THAT YOU ARE YOU, AND NOW FINDING LOVE WITH (MAN? BLAK-I-HOPE) OTHER THAN ME!!! I LOVE YOU THANK YOU SO MUCH
Read more

Nancy! Meanwhile yes un-erasably I will keep Thee 'top of mind'-- praying I also do not do come too-to-more 'discomfort' to the breach 'stalking' as you may deem it... but I am scared-as-hell about stalking you and will do my utmost to avoid that 'charge.'

 This is so-clearly true: I cannot given my acquaintance of you, bipolar hiker camper, 'wildflower,' rid you from my consciouseness, cannot 'shake' you as the saying goes. Some stubborn elements that for you may be lethally-discomforting-- let's say hope and the sense-maybe-possibility-- keep me thinking of you... In point of fact, I know that from the first moment of this silence/'ghosting' anger has never been how my thoughts of you occur: you stay 'special' and this in all seems best to mean let-you-go the way you have chosen... I think this will not be 'stalking' if I violate especially by over-messaging my orientation toward you... I want you to always be loved... Maybe you are getting love communally at 959 Imperial Point Drive, Ballwin/Manchester MO; that seems OK and utterly plausible. I must have the dead-reckoning that perhaps I as jejeune phone buddy was to you a relation that 'was not going anywhere,' and all-along let...
Read more