How in the name of Truth might you ever try a 'blockage' on the claim that I STALK you? I do guess, Lady-Most, that my continued LOVE (a reality) for you is legally OK, and no I have not but for 8 direct counted notes to you since May 31 of this year ACTED TO DO OTHER THAN TRY KISS&MAKE-UP GAMBITS. It would appear though that VERY TAUNT is the seeming hiatus betwixt us: my love-yes-real seems prudent to even think of you (my RealMentalPresence) to regard you with something approximating fear/trepidation/?terror?

 Since 2024.3.13, then especially since 2024.4.16, it has been awful: at a level close to veneration of you, and with great incomprehension, on 'nothingness' of information, I have REALLY WITH DEFERENCE tried not to bother you, a 'Siren-challenge' because I soul-esteemed you as friend, a friend whose given two years of OK to me made me like chatting with you at the fundamental level: it is not the case at all that this liking had any 'agenda,' yes to the extent that my love for you would entirely be satisfied if we were 'phone buddies.'

Loss. The-no-evident-reason-why silent treatment, which others told me is called ghosting, seems granite-hard real... To wit then, I have not phoned you from respect, have tried to keep my texts otherwise to you of the-lets-kiss-make-up sort, but the no-response so puzzling for me with no understanding just to me demands circumspection, if not a paranoia that for no guessable reason you hate or come so close to hate for me that I just here on the Web-- of the tandem wish to Hello-You at the same time to respect you my entries of this sort (in blog) try not to make an easily identification of your person.

There may be hints that, rather at not my purpose, you 'follow' these Web-logs, with linkings that suggest you do NOT hate me-- but that inference, really just hope with guesses from tidbits, is iffy and in a word if your 'ghosting' derives from a reasoned shunning that I can understand, this would be different... 

My love for you is deep, will abide... guessing you out IS ABSOLUTELY NO GOOD; the I-cannot-shake-you seemingly might (why?) invite real peril for me... I in so re-membering a love (4U) of nigh-two-years then will have to remain ultra-cautious. I calculate now: the binomial, one-tail test probability that I would 'actively' message you is .000022536, meaning that there is but a one-in-44373-instances-or-so that I might directly (except indirectly by this blog-method, say) message you...

Then it would not seem at all 'fair' that anyone-- even you if you hate me for some reason-- would say that my notes to you are at the level of harrassment-- where are the negativities of my messages?-- far be it from a claim the vogue now for women-- of STALKING.

WOW!!! But has it come this far? How in the name of Truth might you ever try a 'blockage' on the claim that I STALK you? I do guess, Lady-Most, that my continued LOVE (a reality) for you is legally OK, and no I have not but for 8 direct counted notes to you since May 31 of this year ACTED TO DO OTHER THAN TRY KISS&MAKE-UP GAMBITS. It would appear though that VERY TAUNT is the seeming hiatus betwixt us: my love-yes-real seems prudent to even think of you (my RealMentalPresence) to regard you with something approximating fear/trepidation/?terror?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

νηζ! Fluffy-Flower! Wildflower! I never DID want you to be faithful to me: that is all I have ever told you for an 'expectation' WHEN WILL YOU TELL ME ABOUT LUVs?

I WILL ALWAYS LOVE YOU

Nancy! Meanwhile yes un-erasably I will keep Thee 'top of mind'-- praying I also do not do come too-to-more 'discomfort' to the breach 'stalking' as you may deem it... but I am scared-as-hell about stalking you and will do my utmost to avoid that 'charge.'